|
Table of Contents:
The Final Framework:
|
|
Context: Rules & Division of Labour
|
Purpose: To interrogate the rules which structure the learning activity and the roles played by participants.
References: 43, 49
- What are the rules surrounding the learning task [including education institution & workplace rules]?
- How formally are the rules of interaction stated?
- How have these rules evolved? What are the sources of those rules?
- How widely understood are these rules?
- How are the rules being enforced?
- How are infractions being dealt with?
- How is dissension expressed?
- How is dissension received by the teacher or other group members?
- External limitations:
- What are the assumptions about time and effort to be expended on this activity?
- What are some of the limitations to learning imposed by other demands/requirements placed on the learner? [e.g., home duties, workplace duties, job-seeking tasks]
- What are some of the limitations to learning imposed by lack of suitable artefacts? [e.g., outdated or incompatible technology/software, printed texts not accessible]
- How does the activity share the responsibility for the essential part of the work between teacher and learner/s and among learners?
- Who decides? How? Why?
- Does the division of labour [including power relationships]:
- embed and impose a certain division of labour?
- make the work organisation visible and comprehensible?
- enable the reorganisation of the division of labour?
- What roles surround the learning activity?
- Who has traditionally or historically assumed the various roles?
- How are those roles assigned?
- How have these roles changed over time?
- How permanent are these roles?
- Are the roles person-specific or task-specific?
- How well accepted will these roles be by the learners? The institution?
|
|